THE GOSPEL UNDER SIEGE
Senior Pastor
Whitefish, MT
To borrow a phrase from Zane Hodges, the gospel is under
siege![1]
There is a battle presently being waged between those who
hold to a grace understanding of the gospel and those who do not. There are
three major systems attacking the gospel of grace: Roman Catholic, Reformed, and
Arminian. All three are distinct theologies, but it is their commonalities that
make them a united threat. This article seeks to demonstrate just that—that
these three theologies are more similar than one might think.
Justification is a lifelong process in Catholicism, which
begins with baptism and continues within the confines of the church. Karl
Keating says “[Christ] did his part, and now we have to cooperate by doing
ours.”[2]
The Council of Trent states:
If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone,
meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate, in order to obtain the grace
of justification…let him be anathema.
If
anyone says that the sacraments of the New Law [canons and decrees of the
church] are not necessary for salvation but…without them…men obtain from God
through faith alone the grace of justification…let him be anathema.[3]
The
Roman Catholic Catechism notes that “living faith works through charity”[4]
and “service of and witness to the faith are necessary for
salvation.”[5]
From
this theology, it logically follows that:
According
to the Lord’s words “Thus you will know them by their fruits” [Mt
7:20]—reflection
on God’s blessings in our life and in the lives of the saints offers us a
guarantee that grace is at work in us and spurs us on to an ever greater faith
and an attitude of trustful poverty.[6]
Thus, looking for “fruit” and
“God’s blessings” in one’s life is the way by which a person can know
whether or not they will be saved.
The following summarizes Catholic teaching: “To gain
the happiness of heaven we must know, love, and serve God in this world.”[7]
Without good works, no one will get to heaven.
Although the nomenclature “Reformed” and
“Reformation” should connote drastic change, the position is closer to
Given the fact that S. Lewis Johnson calls the
Westminster Confession the “standard of reference that evangelicals as a whole
will accept in the main,”[9]
this document is a good place to start.
Although hypocrites, and other unregenerate men, may vainly
deceive themselves with false hopes and carnal presumptions: of being in the
favor of God and estate of salvation; which hope of theirs shall perish: yet
such as truly believe in the Lord Jesus, and love him in sincerity, endeavoring
to walk in all good conscience before him, may in this life be certainly assured
that they are in a state of grace, and may rejoice in the hope of the glory of
God: which hope shall never make them ashamed.[10]
Thus, the Confession states that
only those who truly believe, love God in sincerity, and endeavor to walk in all
good conscience before him, may be assured that they will make it to heaven.
James Montgomery Boice concurs:
…this is not only a matter of our demonstrating a genuinely
changed behavior and thus doing good works if we are justified. It must also be
that our good works exceed the good works of others…When Jesus said, “Unless
your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the
law…,” he meant, “Unless you who call yourselves Christians, who profess
to be justified by faith alone and therefore confess that you have nothing
whatever to contribute to your own justification—unless you nevertheless
conduct yourselves in a way which is utterly superior to the conduct of the very
best people who are hoping to save themselves by their own good works, you will
not enter God’s kingdom because you are not a Christian in the first place.[11]
R.C. Sproul sums this view up by stating, “In the
Reformed view works are a necessary fruit of justification.”[12]
Charles Hodge, the famous Reformed theologian writes:
False security of salvation commonly rests on the ground of our
belonging to a privileged body, the church, or to a privileged class, the elect.
Both are equally fallacious. Neither the
members of the church nor the elect can be saved unless they persevere in
holiness. And they cannot persevere in holiness without continual
watchfulness and effort.[13]
In a small booklet by John Piper, in which he discusses
Perseverance of the Saints, he writes, “Election is unconditional, but
glorification is not. There are many warnings in Scripture that those who do not
hold fast to Christ can be lost in the end.”[14]
Arthur W. Pink makes the following “line in the sand”
statement: “Readers, if there is a reserve in your obedience, you are on your
way to hell.”[15]
He elaborates elsewhere by saying:
There is a deadly and damnable heresy being widely propagated
today to the effect that, if a sinner truly accepts Christ as his personal
Savior, no matter how he lives afterwards, he cannot perish. That is a satanic
lie, for it is at direct variance with the teaching of the Word of truth. Something
more than believing in Christ is necessary to ensure the soul’s reaching
heaven.[16]
Again, Pink writes:
…all faith does not save; yea, all faith in Christ does not
save. Multitudes are deceived upon this vital matter. Thousands of those who
sincerely believe that they have received Christ as their personal Savior and
are resting on His finished work, are building upon a foundation of sand.[17]
The Council of Trent authors
would probably give a hearty “Amen!”
The Remonstrants, followers of Arminius, wrote in
reaction to the Calvinists, “True believers can through their own fault fall
into horrible sins and blasphemies, persevere and die in the same: and
accordingly they can finally fall away and go lost.”[18]
The Remonstrants thus taught the possibility of a loss of justification.
John Wesley, in writing a letter to a Roman Catholic,
tried to show how similar Catholics and Protestants are. He writes,
If he does not [act according to Christian principles], we
grant all his faith will not save him. And this leads me to show you, in few and
plain words, what the practice of a true protestant[19]
is…
A true Protestant believes in God, has a full confidence in
his mercy, fears him with a filial fear, and loves him with all his soul. He
worships God in spirit and in truth, in every thing gives him thanks; calls upon
him with his heart as well as his lips, at all times and in all places; honors
his holy name and his word, and serves him truly all the days of his life…[20]
Shank concurs: “There is no
valid assurance of election and final salvation for any man, apart from
deliberate perseverance in faith.”[21]
Agreeing Guy Duty states, “We have seen that God’s salvation covenant is a
continuing covenant. And it is a monstrous deception to teach that the continual
sinner will be saved by a continued covenant that demands his continued
obedience.”[22]
Daniel
Corner’s newsletter gives a vitriolic and thorough explanation of Arminian
teaching:
to enter the
It is clear that Arminians teach that by committing some
gross sin the one who is justified can lose their justification and thereby
forfeit heaven if they do not repent before they die. Thus, works are crucial in
maintaining one’s justification.
Anyone who reads from Catholic, Reformed, and Arminian
writings will soon see that although they do not agree on everything, one thing
is clear: all three believe that works are necessary in order to get to heaven.
Consequently, all three fail to teach faith alone in Christ alone. In these
systems, faith and works are co-conditions for entering into heaven. Such
teaching has gone far astray from the Biblical doctrine that eternal life is
given by grace alone, through faith alone,
in Christ alone, plus nothing else.
[1]
Zane Hodges, The Gospel Under Siege: Faith and Works in Tension, 2nd ed. (Dallas:
Redención Viva, 1992).
[2]
Karl Keating, Catholicism and Fundamentalism (San Francisco: Ignatius Press,
1988), 166.
[3]
The Council of
[4]
See, Catechism of the Catholic
Church, Part 3, Sect 1, Ch 1, Art 7, Sub-Sect II, Paragraph 1815, http://www.christusrex.org.
[5]
Ibid, Paragraph 1814.
[6]
Catechism of the Catholic
Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, Sub-Section III,
Paragraph 2005.
[7]
“Catholic Beliefs,” 1990-2001, catholic.org/clife/prayers/beliefs.shtml.
[8]
Earl Radmacher in “First Response to ‘Faith According to the
Apostle James’ by John F. MacArthur, Jr.,” JETS
33:1 (March 1990): 40-41.
[9]
S. Lewis Johnson, “How Faith Works,” Christianity Today (September
1989): 21.
[11]
J. Montgomery Boice, Amazing Grace (Wheaton: Tyndale, 1993), 73-74.
[12]
R. C. Sproul, Faith Alone (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1995), 156.
[13]
Charles Hodge, A Commentary on 1 & 2 Corinthians (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth
Trust, 1974), 181, emphasis added.
[14]
John Piper and
[15]
A.W. Pink, Practical
Christianity (Grand Rapids: Guardian, 1974), 16.
[16]
A.W. Pink, Quoted in Ian Murray, The
Life of A.W. Pink (Edinburgh: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1995), 248-49,
emphasis added.
[17]
A.W. Pink, Studies on Saving
Faith, www.reformed.org/books/pink.
[18]
Laurence Vance, The Other Side of Calvinism, rev. ed. (Pensacola, FL: Vance
Publications, 1991, 1999), 605.
[19]
John Wesley notes, “I say true Protestant; for I disclaim all common swearers, Sabbath
breakers, drunkards; all whoremongers, liars, cheats, extortioners; in a
word, all that live in open sin. These are no Protestants; they are no
Christians at all…” (“A Letter to a Roman Catholic,” in Selections
from the writings of the Rev. John Wesley, ed. Herbert Welch [
[20]
Ibid.
[21]
Robert Shank, Life in the Son (Springfield, MO: Westcott Pubs., 1960), 293.
[22]
Guy Duty, If Ye Continue
(Minneapolis: Bethany, 1966), 65, 169.
[23]
Daniel Corner, “Pairs of Truths,” in Fighting
the Good Fight, Vol. 8, Num. 2 (Summer 2002), 5.